The Golden Game

{Tesagk}

Drawing a card for each blue token is without a doubt the best “mode”, the green token buff is passable, but giving Raise the Alarm tap/untap text is not super useful, especially lategame. Each mode does have different strengths depending on the token producer, which is a nice idea, but the value will fluctuate wildly depending on whether you draw a blue token producer or not. At five mana this will likely struggle to make a significant impact in games. It may be better to trade off the variety of effects for a cost reduction.
(also is it meant to trigger on opponent’s tokens? maybe “whenever you create a … token”)

{Jartis}

Well, this definitely tips the scales in your favor. Asymmetrical discard and sacrifice can have an impact in the short- and long-terms, so I’m unsure on the cost- six is probably the right CMC, since in the short-term Cruel Ultimatum is a much more significant advantage. In a fast metagame it could be five, but that gets dangerous in limited. Extending the Dictate cycle was a neat idea, but I’m iffy about flash on this compared to the cycle- on the dictates it was mostly useful to get the most out of the effect of the enchantment itself, while here it specifically helps control not tap out for it, breaking the comparison a bit.

{Yoshi}

I’ve rewritten my review of this a couple times, but am going to stick with the plus being “very potent” as opposed to “too powerful.” Just lifelink would be good, but it’s also flexible, with two other options that can turn combat in your favor. I do like the decisions it makes, especially with vigilance being an option to protect your new walker. The minus and ult are nice, slightly less W but still within the bounds of Mardu. An additional generic mana or even just 2 starting loyalty would help balance it out unless Mardu really wants to be a thing in the meta.
(also I feel the minus should exile the creature if it would leave the battlefield, as those effects tend to do)

{gluestick248}

On one hand, this is a clean design that plays to each color’s propensity for wrath effects. On the other hand, it doesn’t quite align with W’s typical wrath strategy (most often completely symmetrical, and often favoring weenies) and could quite easily be mono-R- and in fact was mono-R quite recently with Hour of Devastation. Could this see print? Potentially, but it would have to be a tricolor set that can get away with bending the typical multicolor expectations (see: Duneblast).

{kinotherapy}

Not being able to choose a target makes it hard to justify paying three mana a turn, and not using the ability every turn makes it more likely that when you do it’ll be a less powerful creature. Needing six specific mana to get any benefit from it is also harsh, although the payment is split. The potential for advantage is there, but it comes at a cost.

{gateways7}

The name resonates quite well with the concept, although it is ironic that the call of vengeance can lead to more lives lost. I like how this looks to play in an aggressive Mardu strategy, forcing damage through and/or getting trades. It’s unlikely that you’ll be able to buy it back the same turn you cast it for a while, but if you’re running low on cards it can be a great help lategame.

{solring}

Interesting flavor, but ends up being a color miss. A straight wrath in Naya would be pushing the boundaries pretty hard already, but one-sided wraths are pretty explicitly in B. Maybe have it show the collapse of society more through an RG artifact destruction/”damage to all creatures” effect?

{Winner}
The winner is gateways7! Congrats!
The runner-ups are Yoshi and Jartis.

e: quick pings to bump: gateways7 Fleur Jartis