|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on Feb 20, 2023 21:55:19 GMT
Welcome to the Card of the Week Contest! To participate in this Contest you'll have to design a card along the contest guidelines and throw it into the arena with other competitors' entries! At the end of each week, a winner will be determined by forum poll. The winner's card will be rendered and featured on the Welcome page, and the winner decides the challenge for the next week's Contest! Here we go, competitors: our four-hundred and fifty-third challenge!
The winner of the "A pretty silk scarf!" poll was vizionarius with... And the challenge issued by our winner was... Imagine that the Multiverse can be traversed by common folk and not just by Planeswalkers and Praetors. Create a card that highlights mechanics from at least two different planes in the MtG multiverse. Imagine migrants from one plane learning to fit into their new, chosen settled plane, or a mixing of cultural customs, or cross training in combat skills. (The card doesn't have to be common. And the flavor combinations are just for illustration and are not comprehensive of what can be submitted. )
Additionally, please try to keep your entry edits all in one post - if you need to change it you can put your old entry in a spoiler marked "Old entry" and leave the newest rendition to be seen. Just use the edit button in the top/right of your original post.And now, time to begin the challenge! Best of luck, competitors!
|
|
|
|
Post by vizionarius on Feb 20, 2023 23:55:22 GMT
Kithkin from Lorwyn travel to Eldraine and make new friends.  |
|
damagicgeek
1/1 Squirrel
Posts: 77
Favorite Card: Venser, the Sojourner
Favorite Set: Innistrad: Midnight Hunt
Color Alignment: White, Blue
|
Post by damagicgeek on Feb 21, 2023 1:20:23 GMT
 The knights of Bant begin accepting sigils that represent contracts with the Brokers of New Capenna |
|
|
|
Post by emberfire17 on Feb 21, 2023 1:58:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Idea on Feb 21, 2023 4:27:46 GMT
In the search for his perfect soldiers, and without the constraints on planar travel, Nicol Bola's options become much more widely open. Perhaps then Amonkhet would still be death soldier factory it became, but now one geared towards attracting all kinds of travelers to integrate within its 'culture' with the false promises of the supposed god-pharaoh as bait.  ~ So as you can see, I am mixing Innistrad into Amonkhet. Honestly there was a lot of fertile ground here, as both sets have a lot in common (lots of graveyard mechanics that could be mixed, or trying different races in amonkeht or the fact both sets have curses). I tried to mix as much as I think of coming together flavor-wise and mechanically while still looking like a hopefully clean enough card. |
|
|
|
Post by t2stonerain on Feb 21, 2023 6:24:05 GMT
 Is the Unfinity space carnival a plane? I'm gonna pretend that it is. |
|
|
|
Post by ZephyrPhantom on Feb 21, 2023 8:41:23 GMT
Snapcaster's Revelation   Instant  Target instant or sorcery card in your graveyard gains flashback until end of turn. The flashback cost is equal to its mana cost. (You may cast that card from your graveyard for its flashback cost. Then exile it.)Miracle Jump-start A lifetime of alchemy on Innistrad solved with one word - "Mizzium".
|
|
BinaryBolas
3/3 Beast
Posts: 184
Color Alignment: White, Blue, Black, Red
|
Post by BinaryBolas on Feb 21, 2023 11:24:42 GMT
|
|
Fermat
8/8 Octopus
Posts: 429
Favorite Card: Force of Will
Favorite Set: Guildpact (set when I started playing)
Color Alignment: White, Blue, Black
|
Post by Fermat on Feb 21, 2023 12:36:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sdfkjgh on Feb 21, 2023 20:46:03 GMT
Imposing Gargantua   Creature--Beast  Vigilance, menace5/5 #ShitpostingOnTheSevens If anyone gets the joke, I'll be real impressed.
|
|
|
|
Post by vizionarius on Feb 21, 2023 21:15:05 GMT
Clever using the keywords introduced in those sets! Missed opportunity on naming it a Cerodon, though!  |
|
|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on Feb 21, 2023 22:32:48 GMT
If so: Time for one of Theros' monsters to become even scarier - on the plane of monsters!
|
|
|
|
Post by vizionarius on Feb 21, 2023 23:21:04 GMT
I'd say so! As long as the mechanic is heavily from a plane where it plays a major role, it's all good. |
|
cdjensen94
2/2 Zombie
I love Gaming, Magic, Writing, and Art
Posts: 108 
Favorite Card: Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger
Favorite Set: New Phyrexia, Ixalan
Color Alignment: Blue, Black, Green
|
Post by cdjensen94 on Feb 22, 2023 0:23:01 GMT
 I've had this idea of New Phyrexia invading Innistrad for about two years now. Here's one. |
|
|
|
Post by sade612 on Feb 22, 2023 4:09:41 GMT
|
|
Lady
1/1 Squirrel
Posts: 80
Favorite Card: Saw It Coming, Secret Rendezvous
Favorite Set: Kaldheim
Color Alignment: Black, Green
|
Post by Lady on Feb 22, 2023 11:19:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by twintania on Feb 22, 2023 16:47:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sdfkjgh on Feb 22, 2023 19:33:01 GMT
I've had this idea of New Phyrexia invading Innistrad for about two years now. Here's one. The additional cost ability should read "As an additional cost to cast Soulless Woodterror, sacrifice a creature." Lady: Your entry could also use some templating help. First off, are you reanimating from any graveyard, or just your own? I'll provide rewrites for all three possible options: Return any number of creature cards with total mana value of X or less from among graveyards to the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white.Return any number of creature cards with total mana value of X or less from any one graveyard to the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white. Return any number of creature cards with total mana value of X or less from your graveyard to the battlefield, where X is your devotion to white. Considering that  is king of reanimation from any graveyard, I recommend you stick to that last one. |
|
|
|
Post by vizionarius on Feb 22, 2023 19:44:38 GMT
Put any number of creature cards with total mana value X or less from graveyards onto the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white.Put any number of creature cards with total mana value X or less from a single graveyard onto the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white. Return any number of creature cards with total mana value X or less from your graveyard to the battlefield, where X is your devotion to white. The use of "return" is actually only used when a card goes from it's owner's graveyard to it's owner's battlefield. In this instance, you don't specify whose control it enters (that it's entering "under your control"), since it is a given. In situations where the card enters to a different player than the card's owner, the term "put" is used, and the controller needs to be specified. With "put," the word "onto" is used. With "return," the word "to" is used (the battlefield). No use of the word "of" when referring to mana value X or less. The term is " single graveyard" when only from one graveyard. No need to say " among" when it can be any amount of graveyards. Examples: From your graveyard to your battlefield. From your graveyard to opponent's battlefield. From opponent's graveyard to your battlefield. From opponent's graveyard to their battlefield. |
|
|
|
Post by sdfkjgh on Feb 22, 2023 20:31:54 GMT
Put any number of creature cards with total mana value X or less from graveyards onto the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white.Put any number of creature cards with total mana value X or less from a single graveyard onto the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white. Return any number of creature cards with total mana value X or less from your graveyard to the battlefield, where X is your devotion to white. The use of "return" is actually only used when a card goes from it's owner's graveyard to it's owner's battlefield. In this instance, you don't specify whose control it enters (that it's entering "under your control"), since it is a given. In situations where the card enters to a different player than the card's owner, the term "put" is used, and the controller needs to be specified. With "put," the word "onto" is used. With "return," the word "to" is used (the battlefield). No use of the word "of" when referring to mana value X or less. The term is " single graveyard" when only from one graveyard. No need to say " among" when it can be any amount of graveyards. Examples: From your graveyard to your battlefield. From your graveyard to opponent's battlefield. From opponent's graveyard to your battlefield. From opponent's graveyard to their battlefield. Thanks. Glad to know that there are others better at this than me. |
|
cdjensen94
2/2 Zombie
I love Gaming, Magic, Writing, and Art
Posts: 108
Favorite Card: Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger
Favorite Set: New Phyrexia, Ixalan
Color Alignment: Blue, Black, Green
|
Post by cdjensen94 on Feb 22, 2023 23:13:39 GMT
|
|
spazlaz
6/6 Wurm
Posts: 333
Color Alignment: Blue, Black
|
Post by spazlaz on Feb 23, 2023 0:46:49 GMT
|
|
Lady
1/1 Squirrel
Posts: 80
Favorite Card: Saw It Coming, Secret Rendezvous
Favorite Set: Kaldheim
Color Alignment: Black, Green
|
Post by Lady on Feb 23, 2023 9:05:10 GMT
The additional cost ability should read "As an additional cost to cast Soulless Woodterror, sacrifice a creature." Lady : Your entry could also use some templating help. First off, are you reanimating from any graveyard, or just your own? I'll provide rewrites for all three possible options: Return any number of creature cards with total mana value of X or less from among graveyards to the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white.Return any number of creature cards with total mana value of X or less from any one graveyard to the battlefield under your control, where X is your devotion to white. Return any number of creature cards with total mana value of X or less from your graveyard to the battlefield, where X is your devotion to white. Considering that is king of reanimation from any graveyard, I recommend you stick to that last one. Ah, thanks. Didn't notice I forgot to specify that. Meant to be own greaveyard, cause as you say, taking stuff from other's graveyards is primarily black. |
|
pernicious
8/8 Octopus
Posts: 440
Favorite Card: Mistmeadow Skulk
Favorite Set: Shadowmoor block
Color Alignment: Red
|
Post by pernicious on Feb 23, 2023 18:12:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on Feb 27, 2023 21:17:54 GMT
This thread is now closed, the poll can be found here. And here's the next challenge! |
|
"When in doubt, do a common." 
