The Un-Game

{Spoiler}Wish of the Week is a really interesting concept for this challenge and fits it perfectly. It even highlights the site and gives play opportunity to otherwise one-off cards. That being said, it should be noted what we're talking about here. You don't get to cast the card of the week for free, you have to pay its mana cost on top of this. Since you don't get to play it any other turn, this in effect makes it the red effect impulse draw. Compare it to the same mana value card Act on Impulse and one can see how this is straight up worse. You get one card instead of three, it costs two different colored rather than one colored and two generic, you have no guarantee that card necessarily synergizes with any of the cards you could play in a draft (constructed silver border is rarer but in that one you could probably build a deck that synergizes with the card... for a week), nor is the criteria for wining card of the week necessarily power. It could be an impressive card, but it could also be funny, balanced or a good reference. This is generally not a good omen for the power of this card. Further, even in the worst case scenario for regular impulse draw at least your card is exiled and there is some chance some effects might get it out of there. But with Wish of the Week, as far as the game is concerned the card just plain doesn't exist and there is 0 ways to interact with that. I think its fun and an excellent concept, but too often too weak for what it costs and not enough synergy potential to really make it go off.

{Spoiler}I guess I wasn't clear on what I meant by "modern technology" so I'll accept "plumbing". That being said even with that this card is just straight up not silver border. There isn't a single effect here you ""couldn't"" be done in normal magic, aside from maybe balance issues. Maybe if did something with tapping for a pun name it would've been better, but as it stands that doesn't seem to be the case. While four counters is a decent number, requiring in theory a 10 mana investment over several turns, there are ways to accelerate it such as proliferate. Further while this card can draw you card, it can also systemically thin out the deck and ramp you once it gets going. It's a decently big investment but given how much of an advantage at that stage of the game and with ramp (not to mention the color pie sorta break) becoming less likely to get a dead land draw is, I don't think this would work in terms of balance nor is there the traditional silver border whacky fun in any hint.

{Spoiler}I like the effect in theory but I think this would be... confusing rules-wise to say the least. If the two stapled creatures are one creature, would that mean a 40 card deck is now a 39 card deck making it illegal? How many games is every game after? The rest of the match? The rest of the day? Actually forever? Plus you'd probably have to do this with proxies or ruin your own cards, which I feel is a little pushed in silver border design.

{Spoiler}I think since you can cast the new card without paying a mana cost, it's better than Wish of the Week design-wise, closer to what you might expect. It does still feature a lot of problems regarding what the card will be that is the card of the week, but that's easier to overlook when it costs nothing.

{Spoiler}I think it would be safe to assume around 3-5 cards as the average result of this. I have to wonder though that the point of the card is. All it seems to dull is exile your own cards and do nothing with that fact. I might've believed the idea was to exile bad/unwanted cards and order only the best, but neither is this card blue nor do you choose which to exile, it's at random. As such, while I won't disregard there may be some combo out there for this it seems pretty pointless. Gameplay and concept wise I like it, and while I think the concept and what it tries to utilize are fun, and I think it would be a bit boring to play normally as just a card you had.

{Spoiler}Has the potential to be extremely broken. Presumably in a draft you don't get to control what you bring (per se), but even then this card might be a put-on-the-battlefield tutor for some or a very specific creature.

{Spoiler}The victory goes to Flo00 !

{Spoiler}100%....potatoes?

It should mention somewhere what the % is / means. The however many percent of something. I think this kind of card, while not difficult to understand, would linguistically seem strange and unintuitive due to that unlabeled percentage. Another strange and unintuitive thing about this card is that it starts at 100 and tries to go to 200, instead of starting at 0 and going to 100. If there was some condition, like you needing to cast this card for it to start at 100 that would be more understandable, but as it is its just a confusing choice.
Balance-wise, I think the card is good. A built-in wincon is naturally nothing to take lightly, but with a minimum of seven turns (and maximum of 10) not counting the one in which you play this card, and utter lack of protection, it works decently well.

{Spoiler}Well, the card certainly seems balanced, but I don't really see this card as addressing the prevalence of crossover content so much as being a part of it. I guess if you really stretch it you could call making another one of something addressing it, but I wouldn't say that meets the spirit of the prompt, and needing to find a workaround to justify it already speaks of the ill-fitting nature of it. There is some interesting flavor to the card of this vibe of a repetitive show with a moral, though I'm uncertain if this card works, because the effect I think would have you tribute this before you could make use of the effect. Maybe there is a window of time to do it between the effect resolving and the saga sacrifice. Either way I think an effect like this would probably either be worded like Urza's Saga where it gains the effect or something like "You may pay , remove all lore counters from ~", and even with that last one I would probably say there would likely need to be an "instead of sacrificing it" type clause in there somewhere.

{Spoiler}I'll give this win to vizionarius