|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on Apr 15, 2024 19:49:03 GMT
Welcome to the Card of the Week Contest! To participate in this Contest you'll have to design a card along the contest guidelines and throw it into the arena with other competitors' entries! At the end of each week, a winner will be determined by forum poll. The winner's card will be rendered and featured on the Welcome page, and the winner decides the challenge for the next week's Contest! Here we go, competitors: our five-hundred and ninth challenge!
The winner of the "Showing off" poll was The Harlequin with... And the challenge issued by our winner was... To increase your chances of winning and to also make creating the poll easier on whomever is doing so, please try to use a render.
Additionally, please try to keep your entry edits all in one post - if you need to change it you can put your old entry in a spoiler marked "Old entry" and leave the newest rendition to be seen. Just use the edit button in the top/right of your original post.And now, time to begin the challenge! Best of luck, competitors!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jartis on Apr 15, 2024 21:16:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by emberfire17 on Apr 15, 2024 22:52:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by viriss on Apr 15, 2024 23:11:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Harlequin on Apr 16, 2024 8:29:04 GMT
That would be a prime example of removing counters as part of the cost -- But we want them to be removed as part of the effect ;-) |
|
elchetibo
2/2 Zombie
Posts: 105 
Favorite Card: Queza, Augur of Agonies
Favorite Set: Phyrexia: All Will Be One
Color Alignment: White, Green
Member is Online
|
Post by elchetibo on Apr 16, 2024 8:47:23 GMT
That would be a prime example of removing counters as part of the cost -- But we want them to be removed as part of the effect ;-) Good point, so I'll change my entry to this :  |
|
|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on Apr 16, 2024 9:01:50 GMT
That would be a prime example of removing counters as part of the cost -- But we want them to be removed as part of the effect ;-) To be honest, I didn't catch this part of the fine print either  Will make add a clarification to the first post once I'm at my own computer.
Funnily enough, that gave me inspiration for an entry..
Take reverse Proliferate, not keyworded as I think it really shouldn't be (and yeah, I know this means the wording probably should get adjusted slightly -will think about that later when I have more time ):
 |
|
BinaryBolas
3/3 Beast
Posts: 187
Color Alignment: White, Blue, Black, Red
|
Post by BinaryBolas on Apr 16, 2024 13:11:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Flo00 on Apr 16, 2024 13:31:08 GMT
 Ananiel's Release   Enchantment  When Ananiel’s Release enters, remove all counters from all permanents. Create an X/X blue Serpent creature token where X is the number of counters removed. If X is 7 or more, draw two cards. Permanents can’t have counters placed on them. |
|
Lady
1/1 Squirrel
Posts: 83
Favorite Card: Saw It Coming, Secret Rendezvous
Favorite Set: Kaldheim
Color Alignment: Black, Green
|
Post by Lady on Apr 16, 2024 19:09:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Harlequin on Apr 16, 2024 19:36:17 GMT
viriss Fading is now vanishing -- Donno if that matters to you ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by vizionarius on Apr 16, 2024 21:39:51 GMT
 Halving Season of Scarcity   Enchantment  If an effect would create one or more tokens under an opponent's control, it creates half that many of those tokens instead, rounded down. If an effect would put one or more counters on a permanent an opponent controls, it puts half that many of those counters on that permanent instead, rounded down. Note: It's an effect that "removes" half the counters each time something would be added... so it kinda fits? Either way, this is my submission. |
|
|
|
Post by viriss on Apr 16, 2024 22:10:24 GMT
virissFading is now vanishing -- Donno if that matters to you ;-)
And yes, graft technically removes counters ;-)
I thought about it but fading fit better with the mechanic of the rest of the card, where you sacrifice when you *can't* remove a counter. |
|
|
|
Post by Idea on Apr 17, 2024 1:13:09 GMT
 {Previous version} 
After much consideration of what Jartis and The Harlequin said, I decided to change the card, though I do still think the card could have worked with that wording for the reasons I brought up. |
|
BunBunGun
0/0 Germ
I apologize profusely for any inconvenience my murderous rampage may have caused.
Posts: 31 
Favorite Card: Zodiac Rabbit
Color Alignment: White, Colorless
|
Post by BunBunGun on Apr 17, 2024 12:44:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Harlequin on Apr 17, 2024 13:18:51 GMT
Note: It's an effect that "removes" half the counters each time something would be added... so it kinda fits? Either way, this is my submission.
If I would be very very very picky, the counter never were on the permanent (would -- instead) to begin with. In the literal sense it doesn't removes, it prevents them to be put onto it.
But I am not that picky. Go ham ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by gluestick248 on Apr 17, 2024 20:49:01 GMT
Counterintelligence Instant Choose one— * Counter target spell unless its controller pays . * Remove up to two counters from target creature you control, then draw a card for each counter removed this way. |
|
|
|
Post by Jartis on Apr 17, 2024 21:32:29 GMT
Small nitpick, I'm not sure if this would actually work within the rules? The preferred wording, I assume, would be "remove all counters from target permanent. For each counter removed this way, put a +1/+1 counter on that permanent." Of course, this will interact with affects that trigger on or modify counters being placed, so I understand if that was trying to be avoided. |
|
|
|
Post by Idea on Apr 17, 2024 22:00:25 GMT
Small nitpick, I'm not sure if this would actually work within the rules? The preferred wording, I assume, would be "remove all counters from target permanent. For each counter removed this way, put a +1/+1 counter on that permanent." Of course, this will interact with affects that trigger on or modify counters being placed, so I understand if that was trying to be avoided. That is something it does, though the simplicity of the wording and effect is part of the reason I went with this. Your wording would work, though I don't see any particular reason why this one wouldn't. Becomes is an extremely versatile term in magic which replaces a property, and is used on things ranging from power/toughness, life total, player properties (monarch), card types, subtypes, card colors, unspent mana colors, names, being blocked, tapping, being exiled, various mechanics like plotted... |
|
|
|
Post by The Harlequin on Apr 18, 2024 7:22:57 GMT
To be strait forward — I have no issue with this entry.
The biggest issue I see here is that I am not sure if the property of a counter can be changed that way. Replacing would work better I guess; And that would also fit into the challenge — If you want to replace something you have to get rid of the thing first ;-)
Replace all counter on target permanent with +1/+1 counter(s).
|
|
|
|
Post by sdfkjgh on Apr 22, 2024 9:44:30 GMT
 Wounded Warrior   Creature--Warrior Avatar Wounded Warrior costs  less to cast, where X is the total amount of damage dealt this turn. Trample Wounded Warrior enters the battlefield with X -1/-1 counters on it, where X is the total amount of damage dealt this turn. , Pay 1 life, Tap an untapped creature you control: Remove a counter from Wounded Warrior. 20/20 |
|
|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on Apr 22, 2024 19:31:00 GMT
This thread is now closed, the poll can be found here. And here's the next challenge! |
|
"When in doubt, do a common." 
