|
|
Post by gateways7 on Aug 10, 2018 3:20:20 GMT
COMMONS:
      UNCOMMONS:
      RARES / MYTHICS:
  
|
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 10, 2018 10:48:58 GMT
The mythic seems exceptionally powerful, though that is sort of the point with them (my own mythic is a ridiculously powerful finisher for red, probably too powerful) but you made nice use of your common slots.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrlozano on Aug 10, 2018 16:21:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 10, 2018 16:34:10 GMT
are y'all posting these for community appraisal so you can change the cards based on feedback before sending over the final set files or did y'all just miss the part where I said to post the cards in the form of a set file
|
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 10, 2018 16:43:21 GMT
are y'all posting these for community appraisal so you can change the cards based on feedback before sending over the final set files or did y'all just miss the part where I said to post the cards in the form of a set file Already answered  can't speak for the others. If we sent you the set files, perhaps you could update the main thread with them so people could look in one place to offer feedback? |
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 10, 2018 16:52:07 GMT
are y'all posting these for community appraisal so you can change the cards based on feedback before sending over the final set files or did y'all just miss the part where I said to post the cards in the form of a set file Already answered can't speak for the others. If we sent you the set files, perhaps you could update the main thread with them so people could look in one place to offer feedback? by "y'all" I meant gateways7 and mrlozano, which I thought was understood. bunching the cards so far into one post for convenience is a good idea though, thanks for that and the set file
would still like to hear the reasoning behind the green unblockable, also
|
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 10, 2018 17:03:55 GMT
Already answered can't speak for the others. If we sent you the set files, perhaps you could update the main thread with them so people could look in one place to offer feedback? by "y'all" I meant gateways7 and mrlozano, which I thought was understood. bunching the cards so far into one post for convenience is a good idea though, thanks for that and the set file
would still like to hear the reasoning behind the green unblockable, also
I did the winky face because it was perfectly clear.  As for Elusive Mongoose, it's unblockable primarily because that's what I thought of when I saw "Nimble Mongoose." Since it was a common, it was going to go to Rare so I figured it would be interesting to offer an out-of-color ability. I ended up giving it a blue activation cost as a result of your initial inquiry. Maybe Skulk would make more sense. Still off-color, but makes sure that it can't become this massive, unstoppable, unblockable thing.
v3 Attachment Deletedv2 Attachment Deletedv1 Attachment Deleted |
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 10, 2018 17:10:28 GMT
I made an alternate version, is this better?
Elusive Mongoose   Creature - Mongoose ( R) When Elusive Mongoose attacks, after your opponent has assigned blockers, you may reassign any creature blocking Elusive Mongoose to target creature you control. “It’s there! Shoot it! -- no wait, now it’s there! There’s more of them!! Run away, get awa-”1/1 |
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 10, 2018 17:23:54 GMT
I prefer this version, because it's actually in color; to me, "modern design sensibilities" also includes modern color pie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 10, 2018 17:34:20 GMT
I prefer this version, because it's actually in color; to me, "modern design sensibilities" also includes modern color pie.
Done. Also, I redid the Set Symbol so it was a bit clearer: Attachment Deleted The previous icon(s) took all of the broken bits, but there just isn't enough space for that, so I chose some of the larger ones and got rid of the rest. |
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 10, 2018 17:38:45 GMT
Much appreciated! There were still some translation issues from importing the previous set symbol, but this one pops much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by ZephyrPhantom on Aug 10, 2018 19:24:44 GMT
Here's my set file. I mainly focused on keeping things straightforward and decided against keeping specific keywords in to better help my part fit with anything else the other designers might put out. |
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 10, 2018 19:32:05 GMT
This is what the updated set symbol looks like on a card.  |
|
|
|
Post by augur on Aug 10, 2018 21:16:55 GMT
Pass 1.5 Attachment DeletedI can see myself redoing about half of the cards- most are pretty boring. Maybe art + new names will make them look better. |
|
|
|
Post by Xenagos on Aug 11, 2018 1:35:50 GMT
First pass done.
Will do a final pass and post tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by gamma3 on Aug 11, 2018 4:14:31 GMT
Is art required?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 11, 2018 5:43:45 GMT
YES, it'll help Fluffy. That being said, if people don't want to do art, just let me know and I'm more than happy to find art for your cards
|
|
|
|
Post by Neottolemo on Aug 11, 2018 9:55:01 GMT
- Art isn't optional, but reusing art from actual MTG cards is acceptable. Tesagk gamma3 Actually, art is required. I'm assuming you misread, but if you meant "yes, art is required, but I can help you with that", you should've said that, not "No [...] if people don't want to do art, just let me know and I'm more than happy to find art for your cards". It's misleading.
EDIT- Also, while I'm at it:
1) Bleed the Innocent looks overpowered to me, if your opponent can't get two creatures out fast enough that's 10 life for 1 mana, repeatedly. 2) Shouldn't the Elusive Mongoose variant with the  activated ability be unacceptable because its colour identity isn't the same as Nimble Mongoose's? 3) Blast of Fire is a colour pie break
|
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 11, 2018 10:36:41 GMT
2) Shouldn't the Elusive Mongoose variant with the activated ability be unacceptable because its colour identity isn't the same as Nimble Mongoose's? Oh damn, yeah, that's right. I ultimately have few hard rules in this project, but somehow amidst all this I managed to forget one of them ^^; |
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 11, 2018 10:46:28 GMT
- Art isn't optional, but reusing art from actual MTG cards is acceptable. Tesagk gamma3 Actually, art is required. I'm assuming you misread, but if you meant "yes, art is required, but I can help you with that", you should've said that, not "No [...] if people don't want to do art, just let me know and I'm more than happy to find art for your cards". It's misleading. I misremembered. But you could be a bit more civil in your delivery, rather than assuming intentions... 2) Shouldn't the Elusive Mongoose variant with the activated ability be unacceptable because its colour identity isn't the same as Nimble Mongoose's? Back to the drawing board on that one then. Edit: Attachment Deleted
|
|
|
|
Post by Neottolemo on Aug 11, 2018 11:20:08 GMT
Tesagk gamma3 Actually, art is required. I'm assuming you misread, but if you meant "yes, art is required, but I can help you with that", you should've said that, not "No [...] if people don't want to do art, just let me know and I'm more than happy to find art for your cards". It's misleading. I misremembered. But you could be a bit more civil in your delivery, rather than assuming intentions... I didn't mean to insult you, I apologise. (By the way, to clarify part of my earlier message - and I know this isn't the part you took issue with, according to your message, but I still feel like I should correct my wording there - when I said "It's misleading" I meant "This may accidentally mislead people even though it was written in good faith" rather than "You are intentionally misleading people".)
|
|
|
|
Post by mrlozano on Aug 11, 2018 11:42:32 GMT
Already answered can't speak for the others. If we sent you the set files, perhaps you could update the main thread with them so people could look in one place to offer feedback? by "y'all" I meant gateways7 and mrlozano, which I thought was understood. bunching the cards so far into one post for convenience is a good idea though, thanks for that and the set file would still like to hear the reasoning behind the green unblockable, also
Yeah, well... I forgot to upload the set file. Fixed now. - Art isn't optional, but reusing art from actual MTG cards is acceptable. Tesagk gamma3 Actually, art is required. I'm assuming you misread, but if you meant "yes, art is required, but I can help you with that", you should've said that, not "No [...] if people don't want to do art, just let me know and I'm more than happy to find art for your cards". It's misleading. EDIT- Also, while I'm at it: 1) Bleed the Innocent looks overpowered to me, if your opponent can't get two creatures out fast enough that's 10 life for 1 mana, repeatedly. 2) Shouldn't the Elusive Mongoose variant with the activated ability be unacceptable because its colour identity isn't the same as Nimble Mongoose's? 3) Blast of Fire is a colour pie break
I agree with Bleed the Innoncent (nerfed it), but if Blast of Fire is a color break so is Pyroblast so I don't think is wrong as it is. |
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 11, 2018 11:54:38 GMT
I misremembered. But you could be a bit more civil in your delivery, rather than assuming intentions... I didn't mean to insult you, I apologise. (By the way, to clarify part of my earlier message - and I know this isn't the part you took issue with, according to your message, but I still feel like I should correct my wording there - when I said "It's misleading" I meant "This may accidentally mislead people even though it was written in good faith" rather than "You are intentionally misleading people".)
Fair enough. Toneless text is toneless. |
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 11, 2018 13:41:28 GMT
mrlozano, how long is Stupefying Mage meant to shut down the creature's activated abilities?
|
|
|
|
Post by mrlozano on Aug 11, 2018 14:04:53 GMT
mrlozano , how long is Stupefying Mage meant to shut down the creature's activated abilities? Until becoming untapped, fixed it. |
|
|
|
Post by augur on Aug 11, 2018 17:50:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 11, 2018 19:30:39 GMT
Current versions of people's parts submitted so far uploaded into the first post of the thread for easy perusal (with dropbox links to avoid the conversion issue this forum has). Will be updated along with people's submissions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xenagos on Aug 11, 2018 21:36:03 GMT
Edit: gosh dang it I could have sworn I set the link to decrypted... link changed, should work now Edit 2: changed a couple of words in the text of cards |
|
|
|
Post by fluffydeathbringer on Aug 11, 2018 21:51:44 GMT
your set file link needs a decryption key to access |
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on Aug 11, 2018 22:02:19 GMT
Gallery for easy viewing. You can even comment on the cards if you want, though in the thread might still be more productive.
|
|
can't speak for the others. If we sent you the set files, perhaps you could update the main thread with them so people could look in one place to offer feedback?
