spazlaz
6/6 Wurm
Posts: 335
Color Alignment: Blue, Black
|
Post by spazlaz on May 22, 2021 22:49:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on May 23, 2021 12:54:00 GMT
Tesagk : The zeroth verse has a bit of ambiguity. You might wanna put a 0+ next to each of them, or add a rule about the card type that states that the zeroth verse is always active. Otherwise, people might think that once that first counter is on it, the 0th no longer applies.
Also, adding a song counter implies starting a new song. Mebbe switch to the already used verse counters? Where would I add it? These cards are already so text heavy. Calling them verse counters is an easy enough change, however. |
|
|
|
Post by gluestick248 on May 23, 2021 15:30:11 GMT
It’s like Auras, but more! Bonds of Love   Enchantment — Hyperaura Enchant two creatures you control. Whenever one of the enchanted creatures is dealt damage, the other enchanted creature gets +3/+0 until end of turn. The intent is that when either creature (or whatever else) is an illegal target, the whole hyperaura goes to the graveyard. |
|
|
|
Post by sdfkjgh on May 24, 2021 1:00:25 GMT
Tesagk : The zeroth verse has a bit of ambiguity. You might wanna put a 0+ next to each of them, or add a rule about the card type that states that the zeroth verse is always active. Otherwise, people might think that once that first counter is on it, the 0th no longer applies.
Also, adding a song counter implies starting a new song. Mebbe switch to the already used verse counters? Where would I add it? These cards are already so text heavy. Calling them verse counters is an easy enough change, however. You could always go with my first suggestion of 0+. |
|
|
|
Post by Flo00 on May 24, 2021 11:06:02 GMT
Hope it's not too late for a last minute entry.  Dance of Flames  Sorcery  Create three Flames. (They’re red enchantments with ", Sacrifice this enchantment: This enchantment deals 1 damage to any target.")Whenever a creature dies, if it was dealt damage by a Flame this turn, you may return Dance of Flames from your graveyard to your hand. |
|
|
|
Post by sade612 on May 24, 2021 11:26:25 GMT
 Zones are cast onto the battlefield, but the permanents they contain are not on the battlefield. Zones created by these permanents are public by default. This one gives creatures anybody summons to it shadow! |
|
|
|
Post by Tesagk on May 24, 2021 11:36:24 GMT
I'm going to go with my original entry of the rat for the contest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daij_Djan on May 24, 2021 21:00:11 GMT
Invocation has to be a super-type, because it alters/adds new rules to the game -- And these are omnipresent. So i can't make it a sup-type (note: some of the cards in this contest don't follow this rule, sadly) Well, since Sagas as subtype were introduced, I don't think WotC minds adding rules to subtypes anymore. Also let's be real: The basic lands already did so anyway..
For my own entry, I pondered quite a bit about what to do. I've done Fortresses way too often to enter them again for this challenge, already did Paladin as well.. With the upcoming DnD set bringing us Rangers and probably other typical pen and paper classes, I didn't want to go in that direction either. So instead, I decided to redo Devoid like I've said it should have been done by WotC from day one: 
This thread is now closed, the poll can be found here. And here's the next challenge! |
|
"When in doubt, do a common."