Card of the Week Contest #297: Overly Attached Cardfriend

And now for the feedback round.

kefke: Repeatable permanent stealing seems really good for 3 mana and probably shouldn't be an uncommon, even permanents as niche as enchantments. I do like the concept though. I'd recommend bumping it up to a least 4 and a rare, maybe as a 2/4 or something.

ZephyrPhantom: Seems quite strong. +2/+0 and Trample for R is already quite efficient as far as Auras go, and the ability to move it around adds quite a bit of complexity to combat, especially if you mix in something like First Strike.

FLAREdirector: Because Bestow is an alternate cost, cost reductions like the first ability already applies to it. That last ability seems a bit overly wordy. Why not just... go with the wording on Simic Guildmage?

@daij_Djan: That ultimate's a needlessly elaborate way of saying "You win the game." There's literally no way in a 1v1 for you to lose the game after that resolves, short of already being dead. That first ability should also probably target.

viriss: That is an incredibly suspicious "becomes attached" right there.

darknova: That text is incomprehensible and meaningless. I can't even figure out what you're trying to do enough to even give feedback.

lizstar: Only feedback I've got is "in" should be "from." I like the idea of using the -Form structure from Fate Reforged to condense the paragraph of magic-ese that is Animate Dead.

Jartis: "On purpose" doesn't justify bad decisions. Equipment that you can't equip is bad. Overly complicating the simple ability of "Creatures you control have firebreathing" is bad. Taking a design and making it bad to force it to fit into a contest is bad. Use the challenge as a jumping off point, not as a stranglehold.

@aargh: Dragon man makes dragons. I like it.

Fermat: That's a giant pile of words for a card that I don't think actually, you know, works. And isn't even remotely White. Also, you have an Aura that permanently alters things it gets attached to, even after it gets removed, which is just... no.

@gluestick: Infinite life with one other creature and a single pair of boots? Mmmkay...

Xenagos: I said it on my own card, but token copies of auras is probably a bad idea. It's a bad idea I can get behind, but still, if we're being objective, it's a memory hazard. Also, technically strictly worse than Estrid's Invocation.

Tesagk: "Cast." It's been cast for a decade. Also, are you expected to keep track of EVERY single creature spell you've cast during your entire game? Seriously?

sade612: I like the tech of adding power/toughness modifications to the box in the bottom right, but the card seems... low impact. Playing hot potato with a Demotion doesn't seem terribly interesting.

@augur: Woo! Fortifications represent! Could probably be a hair stronger, but I'm not sure in which way. More toughness maybe?

jarribas309: You're missing a "target" in there.

spazlaz: Technically, Curses still need to be Auras. Seriously. It's dumb. As for the card itself, feels... unimpactful. Mill one per turn isn't much. A 2/2 flier for 3 is decent in limited, at least, but that much text for that little impact feels wrong.